Testing TMS+Hilbert pattern:
================================================================================

CLI: z=0, x=0, y=0 (TMS y=0)
  Expected TileID: 0
  TMS+Hilbert:     0 ✓ MATCH

CLI: z=1, x=0, y=0 (TMS y=1)
  Expected TileID: 2
  TMS+Hilbert:     2 ✓ MATCH

CLI: z=2, x=0, y=1 (TMS y=2)
  Expected TileID: 10
  TMS+Hilbert:     9 ✗ MISMATCH (diff: -1)

CLI: z=3, x=1, y=3 (TMS y=4)
  Expected TileID: 36
  TMS+Hilbert:     38 ✗ MISMATCH (diff: 2)

CLI: z=4, x=3, y=6 (TMS y=9)
  Expected TileID: 140
  TMS+Hilbert:     155 ✗ MISMATCH (diff: 15)

✗ Pattern doesn't fully match - investigating...

Analyzing differences:
z=0, x=0, y=0 → TileID 0
  Direct Hilbert: 0 (diff: 0)
  TMS+Hilbert:    0 (diff: 0)
z=1, x=0, y=0 → TileID 2
  Direct Hilbert: 1 (diff: -1)
  TMS+Hilbert:    2 (diff: 0)
z=2, x=0, y=1 → TileID 10
  Direct Hilbert: 8 (diff: -2)
  TMS+Hilbert:    9 (diff: -1)
z=3, x=1, y=3 → TileID 36
  Direct Hilbert: 33 (diff: -3)
  TMS+Hilbert:    38 (diff: 2)
z=4, x=3, y=6 → TileID 140
  Direct Hilbert: 136 (diff: -4)
  TMS+Hilbert:    155 (diff: 15)